New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ProdLike workflow for premixing #33037
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33037/21336
|
A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/PyReleaseValidation @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @wajidalikhan, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
test parameters: |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3c0d6d/13209/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
@kpedro88 , @srimanob cmssw/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py Lines 150 to 1078 in d6cab1d
|
@chayanit the offsets in this PR are just a concatenation of the offsets of the component workflows. I agree it would be good to have more documentation. As a start, we could add a README.md in Configuration/PyReleaseValidation, much as we previously did for Configuration/Geometry. |
Cool thanks for your reply. Would you be able to help on this README? |
@chayanit I will add it to my todo list. |
Thanks a lot @kpedro88! |
+1 |
Pull request #33037 was updated. @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @wajidalikhan, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @srimanob can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3c0d6d/13340/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
@slava77 we actually need the matrix map for 34634.0 and 34834.999 |
what's the first IB with these? |
It should be CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-03-04-1800, which includes #33007 |
looking back in my inbox; indeed, it's been a while. I guess I managed to filter these out mentally. |
|
+Upgrade This PR is to add Prod-like Premixing workflow, and update README. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
By the way, @kpedro88 Sorry for late response. Thanks. |
@srimanob the most recent TDR campaign uses pdigi_valid: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/Phase2HLTTDRWinter20DR |
@kpedro88 |
PR description:
A premixing production-like workflow is added for profiling purposes.
PR validation:
Ran new workflow 23434.9921 successfully.