Phase2-gex81 Modify the Phase2 scenarios to work for dd4hep

[bsunanda]

PR description:

Modify the Phase2 scenarios (including the right cff for tracker) to work for dd4hep

PR validation:

Tested using runTheMatrix Phase2 workflows

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

Nothing special

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34284/23593

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/Geometry/python/dict2026Geometry.py modified in PR(s): Run 2, Run3, and Phase2 tracker: adding T27 (geometry with bricked pixels) and support for storing bricked pixel information #34120, update the tracking material for Phase2 geometry D49 #30126

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34284/23593/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34284/23593/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34284/23594

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/Geometry/python/dict2026Geometry.py modified in PR(s): Run 2, Run3, and Phase2 tracker: adding T27 (geometry with bricked pixels) and support for storing bricked pixel information #34120, update the tracking material for Phase2 geometry D49 #30126

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Geometry
Geometry/TrackerNumberingBuilder

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@vargasa, @makortel, @JanFSchulte, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @mtosi, @fabiocos, @slomeo, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8cf757/16331/summary.html
COMMIT: 49f1f6c
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-06-29-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/34284/16331/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 14 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2785711
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 18
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2785670
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 37 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[srimanob]

Hi @bsunanda
As PR test does not include Phast-2 dd4hep workflow, could you please clarify a bit on testing and it is only a known stopper to run dd4hep in Phase-2 until the end (not include validation) ?

[cvuosalo]

+1

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

As presented in the simulation meeting (2 July), https://indico.cern.ch/event/1053571/

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[qliphy]

+1