Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed the PPS alignment relval - 1042 #35874

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 30, 2021

Conversation

MatiXOfficial
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Following #35631 (and #35764), this PR fixes the PPS alignment relval by adding EDMtoMEConverter to the 4th, harvesting step. Now, the harvester can read the plots booked by the worker in the 3rd step.

The results of the matrix test still contain corrections set to 0 though. The reason for that is insufficient (100) number of events. So, is there any way to increase the number of events to be more than 100?

PR validation:

The 1042 relval behaves as expected.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35874/26271

  • This PR adds an extra 28KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @MatiXOfficial (Mateusz Kocot) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • CalibPPS/AlignmentGlobal (alca)
  • Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)

@perrotta, @malbouis, @yuanchao, @tvami, @cmsbuild, @qliphy, @francescobrivio, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabiocos, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @fabferro, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @tocheng, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @rovere, @lecriste, @mtosi, @ebrondol, @mmusich, @dgulhan, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

type bug-fix

fixes #35764

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

The results of the matrix test still contain corrections set to 0 though. The reason for that is insufficient (100) number of events. So, is there any way to increase the number of events to be more than 100?

Please run the workflow yourself on a larger number of events

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 28, 2021

@perrotta is 1042 part of the standard relvals?

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 28, 2021

@cmsbuild , please abort

  • it's not part of it

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 28, 2021

test parameters:

  • workflows = 1042

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 28, 2021

@cmsbuild , please test

@MatiXOfficial
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please run the workflow yourself on a larger number of events

@perrotta I'm not sure I understand what you mean. I can run the worker and the harvester on another dataset with a larger number of events (like here), but I don't know how to increase the number of events in the workflow.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

Please run the workflow yourself on a larger number of events

@perrotta I'm not sure I understand what you mean. I can run the worker and the harvester on another dataset with a larger number of events (like here), but I don't know how to increase the number of events in the workflow.

runTheMatrix.py -l 1042 --command "-n 1000" > & out &

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 28, 2021

@MatiXOfficial if you want your wf to have 1000 events in the RelVals that you can do by adding
-n 1000
in
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/blob/master/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py#L2137
(or the equivalent 'TIER0EXPPPSCAL','ALCASPLITPPSALIG','ALCAHARVDPPSALIG' depending on which one you want to change)

I'm not sure this is the preferred way to go I'm just saying this is the technical way to do it

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7758b1/20058/summary.html
COMMIT: 03db82d
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_2_X_2021-10-28-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35874/20058/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-7758b1/1042.0_RunExpressPhy2017F+RunExpressPhy2017F+TIER0EXPPPSCALALIG+ALCASPLITPPSALIG+ALCAHARVDPPSALIG

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 42
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2901440
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2901412
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 41 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 177 log files, 37 edm output root files, 42 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 29, 2021

Screen Shot 2021-10-29 at 23 11 47

Nice, I see non-empty plots, as expected after all!

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 29, 2021

+alca

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 29, 2021

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 @cms-sw/upgrade-l2
this PR changes the number of events in this wf, but it still runs very fast, please consider signing

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

@bbilin
Copy link
Contributor

bbilin commented Oct 30, 2021

@MatiXOfficial @tvami I think we would like to drop the -n 1000 option in two places. Otherwise it looks ok.

I take it back, there are other examples, it shall be kept as it is.

@bbilin
Copy link
Contributor

bbilin commented Oct 30, 2021

+1

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 30, 2021

@perrotta @qliphy this is essentially fully signed now

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Oct 30, 2021

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants