Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MkFit] Fix uninitialized MkFinder::m_prop_config in backward-fit. #37038

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 23, 2022

Conversation

osschar
Copy link
Contributor

@osschar osschar commented Feb 22, 2022

  • Introduce new MkFinder::setup_bkfit() function needed to setup
    local configuration pointers for backward-fit and use this
    in MkBuilder bk-fit steering function.
  • Consistenly call MkFinder::release() from track finding steering
    code to re-initialize MkFinder configuration pointers to nullptr.
    This was effectively masking the issue of the missing setup call.

This addresses #37017

- Introduce new MkFinder::setup_bkfit() function needed to setup
  local configuration pointers for backward-fit and use this
  in MkBuilder bk-fit steering function.
- Consistenly call MkFinder::release() from track finding steering
  code to re-initialize MkFinder configuration pointers to nullptr.
  This was effectively masking the issue of the missing setup call.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37038/28469

  • This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37038/28471

  • This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @osschar (Matevž Tadel) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoTracker/MkFitCore (reconstruction)

@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @ebrondol, @gpetruc, @mmusich, @mtosi, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

Please test

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

test parameters:

  • workflows = 136.817,136.822,136.824,136.867

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Feb 22, 2022

please abort
(I am not sure if the extra workflows can be picked even if the "test parameters" command is issued after "please test")

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test
(Now they should...)

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Feb 22, 2022

test parameters:

* workflows = 136.817,136.822,136.824,136.867

I think that workflow_threading is more appropriate here (assuming that I understood correctly that workflow_threading makes these workflows to run on multiple threads)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Feb 23, 2022

please abort

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Feb 23, 2022

test parameters:

  • enable_test = threading
  • workflow_threading = 136.817,136.822,136.824,136.867
  • workflows = 136.817,136.822,136.824,136.867

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Feb 23, 2022

please test

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Feb 23, 2022

type bugfix

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dce720/22599/summary.html
COMMIT: 2c35d3a
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_3_X_2022-02-22-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc10
Additional Tests: THREADING
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37038/22599/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-dce720/136.817_RunDoubleEG2017E+RunDoubleEG2017E+HLTDR2_2017+RECODR2_2017reHLT_skimDoubleEG_Prompt+HARVEST2017_skimDoubleEG
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-dce720/136.822_RunSingleEl2017E+RunSingleEl2017E+HLTDR2_2017+RECODR2_2017reHLT_Prompt_L1TEgDQM+HARVEST2017_L1TEgDQM
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-dce720/136.824_RunSinglePh2017E+RunSinglePh2017E+HLTDR2_2017+RECODR2_2017reHLT_skimSinglePh_Prompt+HARVEST2017_skimSinglePh
  • /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-dce720/136.867_RunSingleMu2018B+RunSingleMu2018B+HLTDR2_2018+RECODR2_2018reHLT_skimSingleMu_Offline_Lumi+HARVEST2018_L1TMuDQM

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4001143
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4001113
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 204 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@clacaputo
Copy link
Contributor

+reconstruction

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • To have it included in this night' IB

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants