Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

packet_t should have options #3

Closed
0xf104a opened this issue Jan 24, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

packet_t should have options #3

0xf104a opened this issue Jan 24, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
@0xf104a @DedAzaMarks
Labels
enhancement New feature or request invalid This doesn't seem right

Comments

@0xf104a
Copy link
Owner

0xf104a commented Jan 24, 2020

There is no way how to pass an options to interface module(e.g. mod_tcp). The fix will be done in @DedAzaMarks 's branch (mod_tcp). We decided to add hashtable to packet_t which will store option values.
@0xf104a 0xf104a added enhancement New feature or request invalid This doesn't seem right labels Jan 24, 2020
@0xf104a 0xf104a changed the title pakcet_t should have options packet_t should have options Jan 24, 2020
@0xf104a 0xf104a pinned this issue Jan 24, 2020
0xf104a pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2020
Fixed Issue #3 in core code
b11b0c1
0xf104a pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2020
Fixed Issue #3 in libddos2. Update .gitignore
e85f9bc
@0xf104a
Copy link
Owner Author

0xf104a commented Jan 27, 2020

Fixed in branch mod_tcp

0xf104a pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2020
Fixed issue #3 one more time
0a11c14
@0xf104a 0xf104a closed this as completed Apr 9, 2020
@DedAzaMarks
Copy link
Collaborator

DedAzaMarks commented Apr 9, 2020 via email

@0xf104a
Copy link
Owner Author

0xf104a commented Apr 9, 2020

(Un)fortunately no. Fix of this issue was merged with branch mod_udp and thus issue was closed.

@0xf104a 0xf104a unpinned this issue Apr 10, 2020
@DedAzaMarks
Copy link
Collaborator

DedAzaMarks commented Feb 1, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@0xf104a 0xf104a

@DedAzaMarks DedAzaMarks

Labels
enhancement New feature or request invalid This doesn't seem right
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@0xf104a @DedAzaMarks