-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
Update sslyze and use Python integration #55
Comments
I'm curious -- have you folks looked at testssl.sh? |
Nope, I hadn't seen it. For the thread's reference, it's: The entire thing is written in Bash. I'm pretty happy with sslyze, personally, but open to anything if you have thoughts. |
I was just curious. I don't know what the respective test coverage is between these tools, and thought it might be useful to look at alternatives. I definitely appreciate that sslyze is written in Python and nicely handles running multiple checks in parallel, so as to speed up the overall amount of time required to run a set of tests against a given set of targets. I just found out about this tool recently myself, and so I wanted to let you folks know about it, and see what you thought. |
@konklone - Just to confirm, is this still outstanding? If so, do you want to keep it open? |
This is done in #151. |
This looks promising:
http://nabla-c0d3.github.io/blog/2016/02/01/sslyze-0.13.3-released/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: