Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 17, 2021. It is now read-only.

Update sslyze and use Python integration #55

Closed
konklone opened this issue Feb 3, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Update sslyze and use Python integration #55

konklone opened this issue Feb 3, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@konklone
Copy link
Contributor

konklone commented Feb 3, 2016

This looks promising:

http://nabla-c0d3.github.io/blog/2016/02/01/sslyze-0.13.3-released/

@bknowles
Copy link

bknowles commented Feb 3, 2016

I'm curious -- have you folks looked at testssl.sh?

@konklone
Copy link
Contributor Author

konklone commented Feb 3, 2016

Nope, I hadn't seen it. For the thread's reference, it's:

The entire thing is written in Bash. I'm pretty happy with sslyze, personally, but open to anything if you have thoughts.

@bknowles
Copy link

bknowles commented Feb 4, 2016

I was just curious. I don't know what the respective test coverage is between these tools, and thought it might be useful to look at alternatives.

I definitely appreciate that sslyze is written in Python and nicely handles running multiple checks in parallel, so as to speed up the overall amount of time required to run a set of tests against a given set of targets.

I just found out about this tool recently myself, and so I wanted to let you folks know about it, and see what you thought.

@gbinal
Copy link
Member

gbinal commented Apr 3, 2017

@konklone - Just to confirm, is this still outstanding? If so, do you want to keep it open?

@konklone
Copy link
Contributor Author

konklone commented Nov 5, 2017

This is done in #151.

@konklone konklone closed this as completed Nov 5, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants