Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable re-rippin` without physical existence of files in folder #558

Open
sasharip opened this issue May 27, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

Enable re-rippin` without physical existence of files in folder #558

sasharip opened this issue May 27, 2017 · 6 comments
Milestone

Comments

@sasharip
Copy link

Is it possible to make application create some sort of list of files,which will be main resource for checking new content?
Main disadvantage of current scheme that u have to store it in download folder,but i wish to have ability to move it somewhere else(ex. to download bunch of wallpapers without any order in album,and move them to needed folder,without forcing to redownload them every time)
And i got pretty large library with some bad images,but deleting them won't make them appear again after re-ripping.

@rautamiekka
Copy link

rautamiekka commented May 27, 2017

I can tell that's relatively easy to do in Java.

I was thinking about using an SQLite database, but it's likely overkill for 99% of users, not to mention editing it requires a more special software and not really too easy. JSON and YAML would be powerful ways since they'd allow to make complex lists, but JSON is highly techy, but then again YAML ain't completely not techy either.

@sasharip
Copy link
Author

i could do this but ripper to hard for me to understand
the simplest way to do this is to check filename(and/or check size)with list of files,which was made after rippin
i do not think json is needed here,simple txt with 1 filename on 1 line is enough

@rautamiekka
Copy link

^ It'd have to do something with the saving path to be sure it's the correct file cuz it can't be just a filename, it has to be a full path to the file while taking the save path in RipMe into account. Saving just this much data would answer only 1 question: is a file with this name on the computer ? It might be enough for every case.

@sasharip
Copy link
Author

^ yeah,it would be pretty much 99% hit in target for my request(for other use-case there is Visipics)
but is it hard to make this?

@metaprime
Copy link
Collaborator

I can't find the issue right now but I'm pretty sure this is a duplicate and definitely high on the list of want-to-have items IMO. Would improve the re-rip experience by a lot.

@metaprime metaprime modified the milestones: On-deck for 1.4.x, vNext May 28, 2017
@metaprime
Copy link
Collaborator

Might be a big enough feature to warrant a minor version bump. I'll mark this as vNext milestone.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants