You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The SDC integrators don't currently handle how we update species where nspec_evolve < nspec. Siince these still have advective terms, we still would need to do some integration. But the current update_unevolved_species mechanism probably is not enough
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When we update_unevolved_species we are still "evolving" those species, just analytically using the other species values.
We could fix this by:
write a subroutine unevolved_rhs that returns the analytic RHS for the unevolved species by differentiating the analytic update equation in update_unevolved_species and writing it in terms of the RHS for the evolved species.
add ifdefs for simplified SDC to network_rhs to call unevolved_rhs in addition to actual_rhs
add analytic RHS for unevolved species to their advective source terms to get their SDC RHS
The SDC integrators don't currently handle how we update species where
nspec_evolve
<nspec
. Siince these still have advective terms, we still would need to do some integration. But the currentupdate_unevolved_species
mechanism probably is not enoughThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: