Provide the ability to add userscripts without specifying a resource

[danidoedel]

Issue Details

Not quite sure if this is the correct repo for this kind of issue.

Some userscripts have an "incorrect" format, but still work fine in other userscript apps/extensions. Specifically in this case it is the @resource header. For this script it is pointing to a website, not a real resource used within the script. AdGuard fails to install the script while other apps/extensions can handle this. It would be great if AdGuard would allow this too.

Script has an incorrect format:

Example script: https://update.greasyfork.org/scripts/463536/%2A%20Gebäude-%20%20Fuhrparkverwalter.user.js

I'm using AdGuard 2.15.0.1701 nightly on macOS Sonoma 14.5

Proposed solution

Ignore invalid resources.

Alternative solution

No response

[Aydinv13]

@danidoedel Hello!

Unfortunately, such a script may simply fail without the @resource or be broken upon update, so we need to check the integrity of the script before installing or updating it.

[danidoedel]

@Aydinv13 I'm not quite sure if I fully understand this. As mentioned other major userscript extensions can handle such scripts just fine. Why wouldn't AdGuard be able to handle it the same way?

[danidoedel]

@Aydinv13 any further explanation why AdGuards behavior has to differ from other major userscript extensions? If there's no resource name, why not just ignore the resource?

[Aydinv13]

As mentioned other major userscript extensions can handle such scripts just fine. Why wouldn't AdGuard be able to handle it the same way?

We'll think about how we can simplify adding a userscript in this case, thanks for asking.