Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why is the license GPL-3.0 when there is no source code? #21

Closed
cgarz opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 9 comments
Closed

Why is the license GPL-3.0 when there is no source code? #21

cgarz opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 9 comments

Comments

@cgarz
Copy link

cgarz commented Oct 12, 2023

IANAL but does GPL not require the source code be made available for any publicly released binary builds?

@now0clock
Copy link

@cgarz with a name like this app, who knows

@Android1500
Copy link
Owner

IANAL but does GPL not require the source code be made available for any publicly released binary builds?

It was open source before but coz of some ppl i make it private they are modified my code and start to sell them without give credit or permission.

@cgarz
Copy link
Author

cgarz commented Oct 18, 2023

I see. That's unfortunate. If they forked the code then that code would also be covered by GPL and they would have to also provide source code. Selling binary builds I think is actually allowed so long as the source is provided. If not it should be possible to take legal action against them or depending on where it was hosted have the offending builds taken down.

It's just pretty weird to have a GPL project with no source available. It might also not be allowed like I mentioned at first, or it might be alright since you are the author but IANAL of course.

@Android1500
Copy link
Owner

I see. That's unfortunate. If they forked the code then that code would also be covered by GPL and they would have to also provide source code. Selling binary builds I think is actually allowed so long as the source is provided. If not it should be possible to take legal action against them or depending on where it was hosted have the offending builds taken down.

It's just pretty weird to have a GPL project with no source available. It might also not be allowed like I mentioned at first, or it might be alright since you are the author but IANAL of course.

Agree with you but those legal thinks take a lots of time which i dont think worth thats why i removed code.

@cgarz
Copy link
Author

cgarz commented Oct 18, 2023

Yea that's sadly quite true. What about getting the binaries taken down though? Would that not have been viable on the site they were uploaded to?

Or perhaps it might be better to change the license?

@MewX
Copy link

MewX commented Sep 19, 2024

I think the question should be "Why is there no source code".

No source code basically means this app does lots of dodgy things.

@Android1500
Copy link
Owner

Android1500 commented Oct 9, 2024

I think the question should be "Why is there no source code".

No source code basically means this app does lots of dodgy things.

You are always free to unuse if you don't want to use but i already give resson of this.

@cgarz
Copy link
Author

cgarz commented Oct 9, 2024

The license is unchanged and the source is still missing, why close the issue?

My previous question remains unanswered as well which makes the given reasons seem more like contrived excuses.

I think I'll take your advice and uninstall after all.

@Android1500
Copy link
Owner

The license is unchanged and the source is still missing, why close the issue?

My previous question remains unanswered as well which makes the given reasons seem more like contrived excuses.

I think I'll take your advice and uninstall after all.

Appericate!!!

Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 9, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants