feat: add support for Etherscan's rate limit [APE-774]

[fubuloubu]

What I did

Added a rate limit on the etherscan client that's config-driven, replicated some of the logic inside of estimate_query for more accurately depicting the rate limit

fixes: #76

How I did it

How to verify it

Checklist

• Passes all linting checks (pre-commit and CI jobs)
• New test cases have been added and are passing
• Documentation has been updated
• PR title follows Conventional Commit standard (will be automatically included in the changelog)

[linear]

APE-774 "feat: add support for Etherscan's rate limit" (ApeWorX/ape-etherscan #77)

What I did

fixes: #

How I did it

How to verify it

Checklist

• Passes all linting checks (pre-commit and CI jobs)
• New test cases have been added and are passing
• Documentation has been updated
• PR title follows Conventional Commit standard (will be automatically included in the changelog)

---

ApeWorX/ape-etherscan #77 by fubuloubu on GitHub

via LinearSync

[antazoey]

this aint bad but we should catch the 429 error, wait , then try

import requests
import time

def make_request(url, retries=5, backoff_factor=2):
    for i in range(retries):
        response = requests.get(url)
        if response.status_code == 429:
            time.sleep(backoff_factor ** i)
        else:
            return response
    return None

[github-actions]

This pull request is considered stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label, add a comment, or make a new commit, otherwise this PR will be closed in 5 days.

[theref]

What is the status of this? I've been running into some rate limit issues

[fubuloubu]

What is the status of this? I've been running into some rate limit issues

Haven't had a chance to fix it up and incorporate @antazoey's feedback. If you copy my work into a new PR with those comments addressed, we can review and merge it

[antazoey]

does anything differ from what was done here: #86 ?
if yes, let's rebase.
if no, let's close.

[theref]

does anything differ from what was done here: #86 ? if yes, let's rebase. if no, let's close.

No, you can close 🚀