-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code Table Request - AMNH: American Museum of Natural History #5886
Comments
I will plan on proceeding with this about 2023-03-27 if there are no objections. I will proceed immediately upon approval of each of the involved collections. Data: Summary:
Users: See also #5771 |
Cannot be converted to other identifier without additional processing. Used to link records across institutions. MSB:Mamm links could be replace more accurately by AMNH:Mamm, #5887, or however they reference their mammal specimens at GBIF. The MSB Mamm records will need to explicitly reference an AMNH Mamm catalog number, not an other ID. |
Nothing about the proposed change affects any of the things you've listed in any way. |
@campmlc I want to reassure you that the proposed change will make things BETTER. Perhaps this would be more palatable if we used American Museum of Natural History Mammology Collection as the agent for all mamm collections? Note that the agent is linked to the collection's entry in GRSciColl. I can create agents for the other types of collections too - although the inverts might get crazy... |
bird collections - American Museum of Natural History Ornithology Collection herp collections - American Museum of Natural History Herpetology Collection The ES and Ento stuff needs review one by one and should probably just use the generic AMNH agent until someone can determine which of the AMNH collections issued the identifiers. (see the list of collections by scrolling down this page. |
That's not an ENTIRELY safe assumption; every mammal collection (and probably everyone else) seems to have a few random things. That aside, if we can somehow be more specific then this is a great opportunity to do so. (And there's now a remarks field in which we might explain some assumptions if necessary.) |
MSB Birds asks for institutional catalog number instead of other identifier. |
|
Reviewed; okay to proceed for CHAS |
This is getting complicated checking through all this. For UCM:
UCM:Herp and UCM:Fish already have the prefix in the field.
|
@ebraker I suggest that you do not add the "AMNH " prefix. I can't find their database, but in GBIF, their catalog numbers are just as you have them now: |
I'm not sure we're being clear on this point: If you do nothing, this is a lateral move. You don't have to do anything, and nothing will be lost if you don't do anything. (But it's a good opportunity to cleanup/check/note problems, or even fix/improve if possible.) I'll post bulkloader files in a bit. |
Here are UCM files for Other Identifiers - Bulk Unload and should be easy to adjust whatever, or I can rebuild them with adjustments for your review if not. Let me know if you need something else. |
@dustymc Thanks, this will work.
@Jegelewicz I think it is important to have the institutional identifier display alongside catalog number (and I am certain that AMNH would want catalog numbers cited with the institutional acronym, as the 'MO' is the collection prefix for mammals). When other_ID_type had AMNH included, it served this purpose. With the suggested transition "assigned by [full institution name'" is less explicit than having the acronym "stamp", which generally conveys institutional ownership at some point. So I plan to make sure all UCM records retain this info. Most already do, there's just a bit of unevenness for some of them. |
@dustymc Just double-checking before I hit the button... i should be seeing this message while unloading identifiers(?): I'm sort of terrified since I combined all the unbulkload files together so this is well over a thousand records. |
Looks like you're good - and an upgrade is on The List. |
Thanks. Fixed UCM records via identifier loaders. |
I can see why this issue got stalled but with MVZ:Bird and MVZ:Herp, let's keep it simple since we have a mix of prefixes too. @dustymc Please only add issued_by to American Museum of Natural History (https://arctos.database.museum/agent/10000305 -- not to a division) where null and and change id_type to 'identifier'. If one day, we confirm with AMNH their catalog numbers hopefully they will also have a proper URL we can link to. Meanwhile please help us clean this up! I manually fixed our MVZObs and the Arctos Entity |
Here's what's left
|
Chas:Bird said yes go ahead. Can you do that one please?! |
thx |
OWU's are updated, ours were Department of Vertebrate Paleontology. |
@jldunnum there's absolutely no way #8042 (comment) can be addressed while this is half-done. The proposal is still to simply move the information to a more-accessible system, which will not change anything at all about the information carried by the legacy type and does not require any cleanup. (It does provide a clearly-needed mechanism to be much more precise, but that's for future use and has nothing to do with legacy data.) #5886 (comment) is, was, and will remain accurate. |
Instructions
This is a template to facilitate communication with the Arctos Code Table Committee. Submit a separate request for each relevant value. This form is appropriate for exploring how data may best be stored, for adding vocabulary, or for updating existing definitions.
Reviewing documentation before proceeding will result in a more enjoyable experience.
Initial Request
Goal: Describe what you're trying to accomplish. This is the only necessary step to start this process. The Committee is available to assist with all other steps. Please clearly indicate any uncertainty or desired guidance if you proceed beyond this step.
All AMNH: American Museum of Natural History should be replaced with other ID type = other identifier and issued by agent American Museum of Natural History
Proposed Value: Proposed new value. This should be clear and compatible with similar values in the relevant table and across Arctos.
Proposed Definition: Clear, complete, non-collection-type-specific functional definition of the value. Avoid discipline-specific terminology if possible, include parenthetically if unavoidable.
Context: Describe why this new value is necessary and existing values are not.
Table: Code Tables are http://arctos.database.museum/info/ctDocumentation.cfm. Link to the specific table or value. This may involve multiple tables and will control datatype for Attributes. OtherID requests require BaseURL (and example) or explanation. Please ask for assistance if unsure.
Collection type: Some code tables contain collection-type-specific values.
collection_cde
may be found from https://arctos.database.museum/home.cfmPriority: Please describe the urgency and/or choose a priority-label to the right. You should expect a response within two working days, and may utilize Arctos Contacts if you feel response is lacking.
Available for Public View: Most data are by default publicly available. Describe any necessary access restrictions.
Project: Add the issue to the Code Table Management Project.
Discussion: Please reach out to anyone who might be affected by this change. Leave a comment or add this to the Committee agenda if you believe more focused conversation is necessary.
Approval
All of the following must be checked before this may proceed.
The How-To Document should be followed. Pay particular attention to terminology (with emphasis on consistency) and documentation (with emphasis on functionality).
Rejection
If you believe this request should not proceed, explain why here. Suggest any changes that would make the change acceptable, alternate (usually existing) paths to the same goals, etc.
Implementation
Once all of the Approval Checklist is appropriately checked and there are no Rejection comments, or in special circumstances by decree of the Arctos Working Group, the change may be made.
Review everything one last time. Ensure the How-To has been followed. Ensure all checks have been made by appropriate personnel.
Make changes as described above. Ensure the URL of this Issue is included in the definition.
Close this Issue.
DO NOT modify Arctos Authorities in any way before all points in this Issue have been fully addressed; data loss may result.
Special Exemptions
In very specific cases and by prior approval of The Committee, the approval process may be skipped, and implementation requirements may be slightly altered. Please note here if you are proceeding under one of these use cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: