-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 794
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VideoPress: Update VideoPress to use the placeholder component from js-packages #29271
Conversation
Are you an Automattician? You can now test your Pull Request on WordPress.com. On your sandbox, run
to get started. More details: p9dueE-5Nn-p2 |
Thank you for your PR! When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:
This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖 The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available. Once your PR is ready for review, check one last time that all required checks (other than "Required review") appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing or skipped. Jetpack plugin:
Videopress plugin:
|
af6738b
to
dd31cc7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test videopress to check that in places where placeholder is used, there are no discrepancies using the new loading placeholder package
Where do I go to test this?
Also, can you edit the pull request title to be more descriptive?
I'm not sure tbh. @jeherve said that he would add people in the loop who have worked on this before. It was a question I had as well, in the original pr I opened. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
he would add people in the loop who have worked on this before. It was a question I had as well, in the original pr I opened.
I added Agora to this PR, they should be able to help with that.
Before they can review, could you fix the failing test here, by running tools/fixup-project-versions.sh
?
Thanks!
Added a commit bumping the version and merging trunk. There were some changes in recent PRs causing conflicts. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work on this PR, @kozer 👍
It should be ok to merge, since you've got an approval! 👍 |
Proposed changes:
Replace
Placeholder
component withLoadingPlaceholder
from js packagesOther information:
Jetpack product discussion
Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?
Testing instructions: