Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Creating LAN Bond (Customize 2 Nic's with custom MAC address) #583

Closed
Cyber-Snoop opened this issue Oct 3, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed

Creating LAN Bond (Customize 2 Nic's with custom MAC address) #583

Cyber-Snoop opened this issue Oct 3, 2023 · 7 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Cyber-Snoop
Copy link

From this comment : #582 (comment)

Hello,
Thank you for your work, really appreciated,
I have the same problem with my config,
I tested with this commands:

PXL_20231003_054329585

capture_2023-10-03 13h37_20

but when I creat a bond with this two, I lose the connection to my DSM
i tried without the command describe above and same problem

Thanks by advance for your help

@Cyber-Snoop Cyber-Snoop added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 3, 2023
@AuxXxilium
Copy link
Owner

AuxXxilium commented Oct 3, 2023

it's normal that you loose the connection if you create bond. bond uses mac from first nic. fake or not. it takes some time to to get an ip, sometimes dsm need a reboot.

your custom settings won't work anymore. because of dsm changes and we had to change cmdline for 7.2.1. also the new cmdline provides less issues with mac and nic and more stability. and we need only first mac faked to get everything working.

@AuxXxilium
Copy link
Owner

Screenshot 2023-10-03 161128
Screenshot 2023-10-03 161017
Screenshot 2023-10-03 161044

Bond is working like it should

@Cyber-Snoop
Copy link
Author

Hello,

Thank you very much for your answer !

So, I made a fresh install with ARC v23.10.1b
My steps: Select DS923+ / 7.2 / ARC Patch / Extensions : amepatch, cpuinfo,
multismb3, powersched, reboot / All modules / Build loader / Load DSM
Setup DSM then create Bond with Adaptive Load Balancing
ALL WORK PERFECT ! :)

image

But...
When I activate LAG mode on my netgear GS308EP, the DSM begins very slowly,
when I disable LAG mode, ALL RE-WORK PERFECT ! :)

I have tested with too ethernet card, Intel PRO dual port (e1000e) and
intel 82576 dual port (igb) = same symptoms

here some screenshot:

image

I notice this:

  • The fake MAC is on the second ethernet port (eth1) but on my DHCP server,
    it's the first ethernet port (eth0)

image

  • When LAG mode on my netgear is enabled

image
we can't synchronize time and surf on package center

image

but we can continue to navigate on the DSM.

  • When DSM Loader is starting

image

You can't see network addresses on eth0 and eth1, but you can connect to
the DSM :)

I test with and without multismb3 extension.

All is ok with https://github.com/fbelavenuto/arpl/releases but it's for
7.1.1 and no ARC Patch... :)

If you need more information, please let me know :)

Thank you very much for your help

@AuxXxilium
Copy link
Owner

if you can't see address, set timeout higher. looks like your dhcp is to slow.

@Cyber-Snoop
Copy link
Author

ok, strange, I have a pfsense under AMD A4 and with your previous version it was show... are ypu modified timeout in the last relase? if not, where is the parameter please ?
image

And for the LAG / Bond, you have an idea ?

@AuxXxilium
Copy link
Owner

ok, strange, I have a pfsense under AMD A4 and with your previous version it was show... are ypu modified timeout in the last relase? if not, where is the parameter please ? image

And for the LAG / Bond, you have an idea ?

  1. look in loader, you will find it.
  2. LAG don't know, are you sure you selected the correct while create the bond?

@Cyber-Snoop
Copy link
Author

Hello,

I made a fresh install with v23.10.3a

  1. I found this:
    PXL_20231009_143702382~2

No change with v23.10.1b.
With v23.10.3a without change anythings, it's ok, cool 🙂

  1. Yes, retested too with v23.10.3a but same symptoms, very strange

Thank you for your work !! Really so well !!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants