Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Internal] [Feature] Refactor to support nanopore data #172

Open
1 task done
jessicarowell opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

[Internal] [Feature] Refactor to support nanopore data #172

jessicarowell opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jessicarowell
Copy link
Collaborator

Right now the pipeline only accepts paths in the illumina_sra_file_path columns. Refactor to support nanopore data as well.

This is tricky because if the user provides both illumina and nanopore data, we'll need to create two separate tsvs for that (as seqsender is currently implemented) or adjust the seqsender code to upload both in one file. The latter would probably be easier since having two tsvs might be tricky with our NF channels.

Place an ❌ in a Box that Best Matches the Feature's Importance:

  • [] 1 - Most important (absolutely integral and will not use codebase at all without it)
  • 2-4 - Moderate (still using codebase for other functions but is serving as a blocker for future use-cases)
  • [] 5 - Least important (would like to see but there are no stringent expectations nor urgency for current/future use-cases) 

Any Additional Context or Information? Has There Been Any Progress Made So Far Towards this Request? Any Helpful Resources to Reference? Screenshots or Links?

@jessicarowell jessicarowell added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 28, 2024
@jessicarowell jessicarowell self-assigned this Feb 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant