Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Intake conversion Template_For_Notebooks #381

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 7, 2024

Conversation

rbeucher
Copy link
Contributor

@rbeucher rbeucher commented Jun 6, 2024

Following the discussion in issue #313, we propose converting the recipes to use Intake, given that the Cookbook is no longer supported and the ACCESS-NRI Intake catalog is now available.

A few months ago, @max-anu began working on this transition. This pull request contains the changes @max-anu made to the notebook specified in the title.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@PaulSpence PaulSpence self-requested a review July 1, 2024 03:40
Copy link
Collaborator

@navidcy navidcy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtml

@navidcy
Copy link
Collaborator

navidcy commented Jul 7, 2024

oh sorry @PaulSpence.. I just saw you self-assigned this one... This PR was a sorta trivial one so if you want to train yourself you better review a different one ;)

@navidcy navidcy merged commit 2770e50 into main Jul 7, 2024
3 checks passed
@navidcy navidcy deleted the INTAKE_Template_For_Notebooks branch July 7, 2024 07:18
@anton-seaice
Copy link
Collaborator

We missed a couple of things:

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt is not needed

This line is a hangover from the cookbook:

loading data using querying.getvar()

I guess we need a new PR :)

@navidcy
Copy link
Collaborator

navidcy commented Jul 8, 2024

Sorry…

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants