Show type material on taxon & names page

[mdoering]

Type Material now exists as an entity on its own. Please show it on the taxon and name details pages:

Taxon
The TaxonInfo object now has a map typeMaterial of type nameID --> List<TypeMaterial>. It is keyed on the nameID so the UI can quickly lookup the types for a given name (taxon.name or any of the synonyms).

Show a types material icon next to each name if any data exists, similar to references.

Discuss how to best present the types. As homotypic names are based on the same types and we recommend only to link types to original names, types should ideally only be shown for original names.

Name
The API has a new method /name/{KEY}/types to list all types for a given name.

The ColDP examples dataset contains 3 types to test with.

[mdoering]

Not all type information seems to be shown. This IPNI type
https://api.dev.checklistbank.org/dataset/144889/name/77126065-1/types

Only shows as Holotype but lacks information on date, collector, locality & remarks

[mdoering]

It would be nice to follow the EJT material_citations_formatting_guide recommendation on how to present material citations.

The preferred order of data fields is as follows:
COUNTRY • specimen(s) [e.g. “1 ♂”]; geographic/locality data [from largest to smallest]; geographic coordinates; altitude/elevation/depth [using alt. / elev. / m a.s.l. etc.]; date [format: 16 Jan. 1998]; collector [followed by “leg.”]; other collecting data [e.g. micro habitat / host / method of collecting / “DNA voucher specimen”/ “vial with detached elements”, etc.]; barcodes/identifiers [e.g. “GenBank: MG779236”]; institution code and specimen code [e.g. “CBF 06023”].

Example:

We don't have all fields yet in our model, but we will extend it in the near future:
CatalogueOfLife/coldp#64

[thomasstjerne]

The UI shows only the type and the citation string - I kind of assumed that it would be generated by the backend. Like for references

[mdoering]

I guess I could built it - preferrably not with any html. Makes sense, it's similar to references and taxon labels I suppose.

[mdoering]

I will produce it on the fly when missing

[thomasstjerne]

Also, for e.g. the Index Fungorum data I found that it was quite difficult to structure the data, so it ends up in just the status and citation. This way, it could be given either structured and the citation generated or as a single string

[mdoering]

I have tried to parse the coordinates into decimal values - would it make sense to render to tiny map thumbnail or the globe like we do on gbif events?

[thomasstjerne]

That would be great

[mdoering]

deployed to prod, seems to work fine