Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

import ASV sequences rep_fasta using phyloseq2meco #18

Open
fconstancias opened this issue Nov 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

import ASV sequences rep_fasta using phyloseq2meco #18

fconstancias opened this issue Nov 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@fconstancias
Copy link

Dear @ChiLiubio,

Thanks for this game changing R package.
I am trying to import a phyloseq object using file2meco::phyloseq2meco.

My initial phyloseq object contains ASV sequences refseq() but it is missing from the microtable-class object generated using microtable-class object file2meco::phyloseq2meco.

physeq
phyloseq-class experiment-level object
otu_table()   OTU Table:         [ 64 taxa and 116 samples ]
sample_data() Sample Data:       [ 116 samples by 26 sample variables ]
tax_table()   Taxonomy Table:    [ 64 taxa by 7 taxonomic ranks ]
phy_tree()    Phylogenetic Tree: [ 64 tips and 63 internal nodes ]
refseq()      DNAStringSet:      [ 64 reference sequences ]
 physeq %>%
    file2meco::phyloseq2meco(.) -> data
data
microtable-class object:
sample_table have 116 rows and 26 columns
otu_table have 64 rows and 116 columns
tax_table have 64 rows and 7 columns
phylo_tree have 64 tips

Is it expected? How ot fix this?

Thanks

@ChiLiubio
Copy link
Owner

Hi @fconstancias

Thanks very much! I find I ignored the sequences conversion between phylsoeq and microtable. I have added this and updated file2meco package in github. It is ok now in my test. If necessary, please reinstall the package from github and try again.

Best,
Chi

@ChiLiubio ChiLiubio added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants