Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Did the authors attempt to make a model for the 5 "outlier" beaches #51

Closed
tomschenkjr opened this issue Apr 16, 2018 · 7 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
analytical model Modifications or results from the analytical model code Requires modifications, changes, or re-running underlying code for the Clear Water model journal submission Pertains to the journal submission process reviewer disagreement Issue is flagged for response where co-authors disagree with reviewer(s) reviewer 1 Feedback from "Reviewer 1"
Projects
Milestone

Comments

@tomschenkjr
Copy link
Contributor

Line 245- Did the authors attempt to make a model for the 5 "outlier" beaches. Did these have similar characteristics that could be clustered together and a unique model made for them?

@tomschenkjr tomschenkjr added the reviewer 1 Feedback from "Reviewer 1" label Apr 16, 2018
@tomschenkjr tomschenkjr added this to the Revision 1 milestone Apr 16, 2018
@tomschenkjr tomschenkjr added journal submission Pertains to the journal submission process analytical model Modifications or results from the analytical model code Requires modifications, changes, or re-running underlying code for the Clear Water model reviewer disagreement Issue is flagged for response where co-authors disagree with reviewer(s) labels Apr 16, 2018
@tomschenkjr
Copy link
Contributor Author

For this, let's push back on this comment. There are a few reasons why we don't want to pursue this line of research in this paper:

  • These beaches are distinct and difficult to predict. Need to identify literature which has also explored this and drawn supporting conclusions for these particular beaches in Chicago.
  • Other literature has supported that these features change the FIB characteristics. We should re-iterate this, especially since this paper is emphasizing inter-beach correlations.
  • We should find any supporting literature of the city messing with breakwaters to align them to FIB characteristics of other beaches. This supports the notion that a predictive model isn't worth pursuing for these beaches.

@tomschenkjr tomschenkjr added this to To do in Revision 1 via automation Apr 16, 2018
@nicklucius
Copy link
Contributor

Here is the original source, from Whitman and Nevers, which led to the breakwater analysis and subsequent removal of certain beaches from the model: Escherichia coli Sampling Reliability at a Frequently Closed Chicago Beach:  Monitoring and Management Implications, which cites Foreshore Sand as a Source of Escherichia coli in Nearshore Water of a Lake Michigan Beach by the same authors.

Both papers are case studies of 63rd Avenue Beach in Chicago, and discuss the mechanisms which presumably result in higher E. coli levels due to the breakwater.

Regarding the city messing with breakwaters, I've pinged the Park District to check in on that.

@nicklucius
Copy link
Contributor

The Park District provided an interesting report about a project where it installed a protective barrier in the water at Calumet Beach in 2012 in an attempt to create a safe swimming zone. After data collection and analysis over the summer, they concluded that off-shore sources of microbial contamination were reduced but on-shore, runoff sources were trapped. As a result, no significant difference was found inside the swimming area vs. outside. The barrier was removed at the end of the 2012 season.

Final Technical Report GL00E00831.pdf

@nicklucius
Copy link
Contributor

I found some more discussion and a citation in an old issue: #1 (comment)

@nicklucius nicklucius moved this from To do to In progress in Revision 1 Aug 30, 2018
@tomschenkjr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nicklucius - let's include a brief explanation for this in the submission letter to the editor. Use these references to create a paragraph on this topic.

@nicklucius
Copy link
Contributor

@tomschenkjr - I added a paragraph to the letter. Please review.

@tomschenkjr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good

Revision 1 automation moved this from In progress to Done Sep 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
analytical model Modifications or results from the analytical model code Requires modifications, changes, or re-running underlying code for the Clear Water model journal submission Pertains to the journal submission process reviewer disagreement Issue is flagged for response where co-authors disagree with reviewer(s) reviewer 1 Feedback from "Reviewer 1"
Projects
No open projects
Revision 1
  
Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants