Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Random small factions #26940

Open
AskaHope opened this issue Dec 4, 2018 · 9 comments
Open

Random small factions #26940

AskaHope opened this issue Dec 4, 2018 · 9 comments
Labels
NPC / Factions NPCs, AI, Speech, Factions, Ownership (P5 - Long-term) Long-term WIP, may stay on the list for a while. <Suggestion / Discussion> Talk it out before implementing

Comments

@AskaHope
Copy link

AskaHope commented Dec 4, 2018

The game could create random small faction camps, they could generate constant conflict and resources for trading that would turn players into constructing bases to trade/fight/team-up, making a stationary base ways better than a mobile-base.

We could also join other factions or accept hunts to earn money and trade, this will make most people feel less like a God, and more like an actual survivor.

@I-am-Erk
Copy link
Contributor

I-am-Erk commented Dec 4, 2018

Ha, I commented something about this in your other suggestion without even seeing this.

I think this is a great idea, but I'm not sure if it should be implemented before existing factions get a bit better fleshed out. It seems to me we should first sort out how NPC factions interact as it stands, and then start introducing smaller factions like this.

It would be, as I said in your other issue thread, super cool to run into a fortified library with a handful of neutral survivors that have set up camp and will trade with you.

@Night-Pryanik Night-Pryanik added NPC / Factions NPCs, AI, Speech, Factions, Ownership <Suggestion / Discussion> Talk it out before implementing labels Dec 5, 2018
@mlangsdorf mlangsdorf added this to To do in Faction Camp Improvements via automation Dec 5, 2018
@mlangsdorf
Copy link
Contributor

At some point, I want to have NPCs capable of upgrading their own faction camps in a step by step process. This necessarily requires NPCs to have their own faction camps.

@CoroNaut
Copy link

Spoiler: There is already a type of camp other than the refugee building implemented in the experimental version

@mlangsdorf
Copy link
Contributor

There's the player created faction camp, which I am well aware of.

There are various bandit buildings.

And there's the Evac Center and Tacoma Commune/Refugee Ranch. What other type of camp are you alluding to?

@Asmageddon
Copy link
Contributor

I think that this has a lot of merit, but for starters, even just implementing more NPC-containing locations would be really nifty, especially if they could offer the player services of all sorts.

@Maleclypse Maleclypse added the (P5 - Long-term) Long-term WIP, may stay on the list for a while. label Jun 30, 2021
@Night-Pryanik
Copy link
Contributor

No discussion in more than two years, closing.

Faction Camp Improvements automation moved this from To do to Done Sep 15, 2021
@Zireael07
Copy link
Contributor

I-am-Erk has been doing some NPC improvements, but I don't think this should be closed (especially as it seems to imply this was done, which it wasn't)

@Night-Pryanik
Copy link
Contributor

Erk (and anyone else) doesn't need an open issue to make improvenents.

@I-am-Erk
Copy link
Contributor

I-am-Erk commented Sep 16, 2021

Please don't do that. We have a long term tag for a reason. This is still an outstanding suggestion. this is even an active part of a project.

@I-am-Erk I-am-Erk reopened this Sep 16, 2021
Faction Camp Improvements automation moved this from Done to In progress Sep 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NPC / Factions NPCs, AI, Speech, Factions, Ownership (P5 - Long-term) Long-term WIP, may stay on the list for a while. <Suggestion / Discussion> Talk it out before implementing
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants