Recipe autolearn should be able to take traits into account

[Barhandar]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hiding recipes is a great feature. However, there are some recipes (e.g. entirety of cannibal ones) that I need to hide every single time I start a new character due to not ever going to utilize them; as far as I know there isn't an option to transfer the hide list.

Describe the solution you'd like
Recipes that make no sense to have without some specific trait (in the most prominent case, human flesh-using recipes and Psychopath/Cannibal) should not be autolearnt if the character does not have said trait. The idea is that non-cannibals refuse to even consider cooking human flesh.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Revisiting the idea of removing autolearn from these entirely - pretty sure cannibals start with To Serve Man already anyway. But that wouldn't permit extra features described below.

Additional context
This would also allow additions like Gourmet-only autolearn of fancier recipes, or X Intolerance/Hates X characters autolearning recipes that avoid their issue (e.g. gluten-free recipes for Wheat Intolerance).

[Night-Pryanik]

The idea is that non-cannibals refuse to even consider cooking human flesh.

Harsh situations (like starving to death) may require harsh actions (like eating human flesh) is no other food is available.

[Barhandar]

Harsh situations (like starving to death) may require harsh actions (like eating human flesh) is no other food is available.

That was part of the previous discussion two years ago, which resulted in no actions, but decision that harsh actions in question only require one recipe - cooked human flesh - and none of the fancy ones.

[kevingranade]

I prefer the auto-hide approach, particularly for the cannibal recipes.

[Barhandar]

Auto-hide that can be written by the user and can distinguish between recipes would work too, though it doesn't allow for "fancy autolearn" as per additional context part.

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. Please do not 'bump' or comment on this issue unless you are actively working on it. Stale issues, and stale issues that are closed are still considered.