Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

== operator in sequenceMatch() #25299

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 17, 2021

Conversation

mga-chka
Copy link

@mga-chka mga-chka commented Jun 15, 2021

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://yandex.ru/legal/cla/?lang=en

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):
Add == operator on time conditions for sequenceMatch and sequenceCount functions.
For eg: sequenceMatch('(?1)(?t==1)(?2)')(time, data = 1, data = 2)

Detailed description / Documentation draft:
Add == operator on time conditions for sequenceMatch and sequenceCount functions.

By adding documentation, you'll allow users to try your new feature immediately, not when someone else will have time to document it later. Documentation is necessary for all features that affect user experience in any way. You can add brief documentation draft above, or add documentation right into your patch as Markdown files in docs folder.

If you are doing this for the first time, it's recommended to read the lightweight Contributing to ClickHouse Documentation guide first.

Information about CI checks: https://clickhouse.tech/docs/en/development/continuous-integration/

@robot-clickhouse robot-clickhouse added the pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements label Jun 15, 2021
@vdimir vdimir self-assigned this Jun 17, 2021
@vdimir vdimir merged commit 7a56ab8 into ClickHouse:master Jun 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants