Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add MemoryTracker for the background tasks [Resubmit] #48787

Merged
merged 4 commits into from May 9, 2023

Conversation

novikd
Copy link
Member

@novikd novikd commented Apr 14, 2023

Changelog category (leave one):

  • New Feature

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Add MemoryTracker for the background tasks (merges and mutation). Introduces merges_mutations_memory_usage_soft_limit and merges_mutations_memory_usage_to_ram_ratio settings that represent the soft memory limit for merges and mutations. If this limit is reached ClickHouse won't schedule new merge or mutation tasks. Also MergesMutationsMemoryTracking metric is introduced to allow observing current memory usage of background tasks.
Resubmit #46089. Closes #48774.

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

  • Documentation is written (mandatory for new features)

@robot-ch-test-poll1 robot-ch-test-poll1 added the pr-feature Pull request with new product feature label Apr 14, 2023
@CheSema CheSema self-assigned this Apr 17, 2023
Copy link
Member

@CheSema CheSema left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Diff looks OK.
Some tests are failed.

@robot-ch-test-poll3
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll3 commented May 2, 2023

This is an automated comment for commit 93e8ecf with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running
The full report is available here
The overall status of the commit is 🔴 failure

Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help.🟢 success
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR🟢 success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process.🟢 success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help.🟢 success
Docker image for serversThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub🟢 success
Docs CheckBuilds and tests the documentation🟢 success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here.🟢 success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read https://clickhouse.com/blog/decorating-a-christmas-tree-with-the-help-of-flaky-tests/🟢 success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment🟢 success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests🟢 success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful🟢 success
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests🟢 success
Push to DockerhubThe check for building and pushing the CI related docker images to docker hub🟢 success
SQLancerFuzzing tests that detect logical bugs with SQLancer tool.🟢 success
SqllogicRun clickhouse on the sqllogic test set against sqlite and checks that all statements are passed.🟢 success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc.🟢 success
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc.🔴 failure
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors.🔴 failure
Style CheckRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report.🟢 success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types🟢 success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts.🟢 success

@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov merged commit a8bdb20 into master May 9, 2023
263 of 266 checks passed
@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov deleted the background-memory-tracker branch May 9, 2023 04:58
@@ -96,12 +96,17 @@ using namespace std::chrono_literals;
static constexpr size_t log_peak_memory_usage_every = 1ULL << 30;

MemoryTracker total_memory_tracker(nullptr, VariableContext::Global);
MemoryTracker background_memory_tracker(&total_memory_tracker, VariableContext::User, false);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess it worth a comment (I guess it fixes this #48774 issue)
Also why is this a problem in the first place? Maybe there is something incorrect in waiting of thread pools?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't have an order when global objects are destroyed.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe I described it not good enough, I meant that if threads was joined, then background_memory_tracker cannot be used anymore, so it should be enough to ensure that the threads was joined, or am I missing something?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

background_memory_tracker do some staff in d-tor. That might be the problem I think. It calls some object which could be destroyed already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-feature Pull request with new product feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ThreadSanitizer: use of an invalid mutex (e.g. uninitialized or destroyed)
6 participants