Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix binary arithmetic for Nullable(IPv4) #51642

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Jul 28, 2023

Conversation

yakov-olkhovskiy
Copy link
Member

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Bug Fix (user-visible misbehavior in an official stable release)

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Fixed binary arithmetic for Nullable(IPv4)

closes #51588

@yakov-olkhovskiy yakov-olkhovskiy added the pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! label Jun 30, 2023
@robot-ch-test-poll3 robot-ch-test-poll3 added the pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default label Jun 30, 2023
@robot-ch-test-poll3
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll3 commented Jun 30, 2023

This is an automated comment for commit 565204f with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running
The full report is available here
The overall status of the commit is 🟢 success

Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help🟢 success
Bugfix validate checkChecks that either a new test (functional or integration) or there some changed tests that fail with the binary built on master branch🟢 success
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR🟢 success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process🟢 success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help🟢 success
Docker image for serversThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub🟢 success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here🟢 success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc🟢 success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment🟢 success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests🟢 success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful🟢 success
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests🟢 success
Push to DockerhubThe check for building and pushing the CI related docker images to docker hub🟢 success
SQLancerFuzzing tests that detect logical bugs with SQLancer tool🟢 success
SqllogicRun clickhouse on the sqllogic test set against sqlite and checks that all statements are passed🟢 success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc🟢 success
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc🟢 success
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors🟢 success
Style CheckRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report🟢 success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types🟢 success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts🟢 success

@antaljanosbenjamin antaljanosbenjamin self-assigned this Jul 17, 2023
Copy link
Member

@antaljanosbenjamin antaljanosbenjamin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The tests seem unrelated.

Copy link
Member

@antaljanosbenjamin antaljanosbenjamin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually shouldn't be the same be done for tuple and number?

/// Special case when the function is multiply or divide, one of arguments is Tuple and another is Number.
        if (auto function_builder = getFunctionForTupleAndNumberArithmetic(arguments[0].type, arguments[1].type, context))
        {
            return executeTupleNumberOperator(arguments, result_type, input_rows_count, function_builder);
        }

As far as I see, the same error could happen there also in case we divide a tuple with nullable number. Did I misunderstand something?

@yakov-olkhovskiy
Copy link
Member Author

Actually shouldn't be the same be done for tuple and number?

I will try to address this in a dedicated PR.

@yakov-olkhovskiy yakov-olkhovskiy merged commit 61d05ae into master Jul 28, 2023
272 checks passed
@yakov-olkhovskiy yakov-olkhovskiy deleted the fix-nullable-ipv4-intdiv branch July 28, 2023 12:27
@yakov-olkhovskiy
Copy link
Member Author

@antaljanosbenjamin as I see modulo doesn't work with tuple whatever divider is nullable or not... do we want it to work? it can be seen as inconsistency because division does work on tuples. And division by nullable doesn't work because tuple can't be nullable.

alexey-milovidov added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2023
Backport #51642 to 23.7: Fix binary arithmetic for Nullable(IPv4)
yakov-olkhovskiy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2023
Backport #51642 to 23.6: Fix binary arithmetic for Nullable(IPv4)
yakov-olkhovskiy added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2023
Backport #51642 to 23.5: Fix binary arithmetic for Nullable(IPv4)
yakov-olkhovskiy added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2023
Backport #51642 to 23.3: Fix binary arithmetic for Nullable(IPv4)
@robot-ch-test-poll4 robot-ch-test-poll4 added the pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore label Aug 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore pr-backports-created-cloud pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! pr-must-backport-cloud
Projects
None yet
6 participants