-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Visual improvements 3.0 #2978
Comments
@ineagu, I think the idea of testing it on real-world sites and content is a good idea; currently, I'm testing with the starter sites, which I found is the closest I can get to a real-world site since I don't have access to any real-world site using WordPress. How may I get access to our blogs, at least to import the posts? Taking this real-world situation, for the next big releases would be a good idea to release an alpha or beta version to selected users in order to have feedback from end-users. What do you think about this? |
Feel free to sync with @selul on that, an idea that I had was to use the staging for our own sites to test theme update ( we use neve on codeinwp/themeisle/optimole) + theme switching and comparison with various other themes. Of course having some customers to beta-test or give us access to some staging woudl be awesome, I think I talked with Marius some long time ago. |
Thanks @ineagu for the input. 1. there is no bottom margin/padding on ul and no top margin/padding to H4 2. Meta spacing for me looks weird, I won't use. I have proposed a solution for this, which is to add bottom margin controls for these elements under the blog typography. I don't know if we have the bandwidth to approve this solution and implement it right away in the version, but we can safely reduce the default spacing for now. I'll follow up with @abaicus . 3. Default H2 is still big when you have long H2 in content 4. Categories aren't looking great, maybe we can tweak the defaults. 5. There are various little things that make Kadence look better in terms of content 6. No separation between posts on archive. 7. Neither Astra nor Kadence display the category descriptions within the menu like we do 9. I would say that pages should not have the sidebar enabled by default. 10. Fonts seems small within tables due to 0.9em rule: |
Sorry, accidentally hit the comment button without finishing :( |
@JohnPixle will need your thoughts on the next points and if you see any improvements that we can add on the theme end for 3, 5, 6, 8, 10. @abaicus for 4, 7, 9 do you have any thoughts, I agree with them and I thought that we already do them. |
@ineagu can you review your screenshots from 4 ? None of us understand your point there. |
@selul we can just say that the category page looks bad, this is how it looks: https://vertis.d.pr/ZUvOqq ( no separation between posts, between page and the rest). Here is how a better version looks like: https://wp-themes.com/kadence/?cat=1 ,https://wp-themes.com/blocksy/?cat=1, Here is 2.x version : https://wp-themes.com/neve/?cat=1 (it has separation) |
What has to do excerpt from initial comment with this ?
… On 26 Jul 2021, at 13:02, Ionut Neagu ***@***.***> wrote:
@selul we can just say that the category page looks bad, this is how it looks: https://vertis.d.pr/ZUvOqq ( no separation between posts, between page and the rest).
Here is how a better version looks like: https://wp-themes.com/kadence/?cat=1 ,https://wp-themes.com/blocksy/?cat=1,
Here is 2.x version : https://wp-themes.com/neve/?cat=1 (it has separation)
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
sorry missed that part. If you look in the screenshot, you would see that we display the featured image twice( I am not sure if it's the featured image or we grab the first image from the content) |
I think there is something special with the Code in WP single posts, that contributes to making the category archive page looking a bit confusing, but I cannot properly evaluate it from the frontend. I think the featured image appears in the content as well? |
I am not sure in what environment you are testing, what plugins are active, etc. You can see how the category archive acts here.
Probably @JohnPixle is right about this.
We can remove that, but as far as I remember users requested this at the beginning. It's the actual menu item description and we only show it if it's defined per menu item. If you define it I'm guessing you'd like it to show up if you explicitly set it. Should we remove it?
We can either default to the advanced settings on the new skin and have no sidebar for pages from the customizer defaults, or simply use a default theme data that has no sidebar (but that won't work for non-fresh sites). |
|
It is not the category description that shows up as I tested it before writing my last reply. 😄 |
I did tested it as well just before replying :D It seems that WordPress by default is copying the category description as the menu description when you add categories in the menu :D which is confusing, because the field is hidden by default. I guess is safer to hide by default and enable with a hook/doc/setting. |
It seems this only happens if you add the category description before you add the item. I'm not sure what we should do in that case as the description field fills itself. I don't know what we should do here. Should we simply hide it when we're using the new skin and add a filter to display it? |
Ok to summarize this, let's agree on doing the next things:
That's all, thank you for sharing your thoughts. |
@selul @JohnPixle I combed through the discussion again and wanted to add this to the list of things that need to be done:
|
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 3.0.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Description:
Some of those might be old issues, but since they are related to the frontend, I would say that if we don't fix them now while we do the 2 styles part, it would be even harder further ( if we want to fix those).
In order to test I imported some articles from codeinwp blog and used several other themes to compare.
https://vertis.d.pr/pagLbK - there is no bottom margin/padding on ul and no top margin/padding to H4, which cause things to look weird when they come one after another. Neve - https://vertis.d.pr/pagLbK, Kadence - https://vertis.d.pr/pagLbK, article is: https://www.codeinwp.com/blog/best-web-hosting-for-small-business/ .
Meta spacing for me looks weird, I won't use.
This might be personal choice, since I mentioned it before but everyone was ok. Here is Kadence: https://vertis.d.pr/bAQHCU, Here is Neve: https://vertis.d.pr/7u7k6P ( title still is a bit too big for long titles)
Default H2 is still big when you have long H2 in content: https://vertis.d.pr/7u7k6P.
Categories aren't looking great, maybe we can tweak the defaults.
Don't we display excerpts by default? here is Neve: https://vertis.d.pr/ZUvOqq vs Kadence: https://vertis.d.pr/ZUvOqq
There are various little things that make Kadence look better in terms of content( no color on links in H, different spacing around various elements, underlined , spacing after H4 etc). I am no expert to say what.
No separation between posts on archive.
Neither Astra nor Kadence display the category descriptions within the menu like we do : https://vertis.d.pr/F3u998
Author pages aren't great neither
Neve: https://vertis.d.pr/Jqx4ls, Blocksy: https://vertis.d.pr/CXaHPN
We can look at author/category pages on themeisle/codeinwp : https://www.codeinwp.com/blog/category/productivity-tips/, https://vertis.d.pr/QHjIWg
10, Fonts seems small within tables due to 0.9em rule: https://vertis.d.pr/Y4tfze
@gutoslv I am not sure if is a good idea, but I would find real world sites/content and test how the release look like on those. I think 3.0 is a special version, since we can introduce breaking changes, for the better, due to the fact that the old user won't automatically get the new version, so we should make the most out of this.
@JohnPixle some might not be relevant, but might worth taking a look and diving deeper for the reasons mentioned above, feel free to see with @selul what make sense to do moving forward.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: