Discussion: implementations or generic products

[Lucyeoh]

Proposal:
Update the standard to explicitly focus on the generic products and not implementations. BUT collect and display implementation questions. Evaluate the core product. Update the language to focus on the product and how it was designed.

In favour:

• Very difficult to evaluate, track implementations, beyond the scope of product owner

Against:

• Reviews are more valuable if they include how they're used

Notes:

• Add implementation and use cases in the registry
• Can you be a DPG with no implementation?
• Very difficult to separate product from implementation, but narrowing in on good or product

[Lucyeoh]

Dealt with via #57 and #71