Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cranly package? #40

Open
ikosmidis opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

cranly package? #40

ikosmidis opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation 📚 Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@ikosmidis
Copy link

You may want to include cranly in your review of packages that produce dependence graphs (I think it was one the first in the game, if not the first), which amongst other cool things (package and author networks), provides a custom package dependence index, that characterizes how much baggage a package has, and which you should feel free to borrow.

See its R package dependence trees vignette for visNetwork visualizations and what else is provided

@ErdaradunGaztea ErdaradunGaztea added the documentation 📚 Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 20, 2021
@ErdaradunGaztea
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey, checked out cranly and we would definitely want to include it in our vignette. I like the idea of package dependence index, though I couldn't find any explanation, what would score equal to 1 mean. I understand that higher score means "heavier" package, but is 1 a lot?

@ikosmidis
Copy link
Author

This is a good question, without a good answer. As with every index, you can only interpret the values relative to each other, because the package network is evolving. But cranly allows you to easily compute the dependence index for all packages at the current snapshot of cran. I am preparing a paper for cranly, so will share the preprint when ready

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation 📚 Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants