You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During "default" instantiation of class SdcProvider - "default_sdc_provider_components" including several role-providers are used.
This behaviour should be changed since a loaded Mdib is modified in a way, that Descriptors are added.
Current implementation forces an application to explicitly deactivate the loaded role providers by setting/implementing the parameter "default_components".
If such default components/roles are needed during e.g. unittests in sdc11073, the mechanism of "specific_components" should be used instead of loading them by default.
-> it must be investigated if the implementation of role provider is affected by and suitable with multi mds Mdibs?
-> descriptions of the behaviour is not document, e.g. docstring for the parameter "default_components"
Alternatives
Implementation idea
No response
Participation
I am willing to submit a pull request to implement this feature.
Link to the idea discussion
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is there an existing issue for this?
Feature idea
During "default" instantiation of class SdcProvider - "default_sdc_provider_components" including several role-providers are used.
This behaviour should be changed since a loaded Mdib is modified in a way, that Descriptors are added.
Current implementation forces an application to explicitly deactivate the loaded role providers by setting/implementing the parameter "default_components".
If such default components/roles are needed during e.g. unittests in sdc11073, the mechanism of "specific_components" should be used instead of loading them by default.
-> it must be investigated if the implementation of role provider is affected by and suitable with multi mds Mdibs?
-> descriptions of the behaviour is not document, e.g. docstring for the parameter "default_components"
Alternatives
Implementation idea
No response
Participation
Link to the idea discussion
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: