You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! First of all thanks for the paper and implementation.
In the paper you mention:
CenterNet, with both center pooling and cascade corner pooling incorporated, reports an AP of 47.0% on the test-dev set, which outperforms all existing one-stage detectors by a large margin. With an average inference time of 270ms using a 52-layer hourglass back-bone [29] and 340ms using a 104-layer hourglass back-bone [29] per image, CenterNet is quite efficient yet closely matches the state-of-the-art performance of the other two-stage detectors.
The inference time you reported is using multi-scale or single-scale setup? I know it is usual to report the single scale time but from your paper it seems you are talking about multi-scale.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! First of all thanks for the paper and implementation.
In the paper you mention:
The inference time you reported is using multi-scale or single-scale setup? I know it is usual to report the single scale time but from your paper it seems you are talking about multi-scale.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: