Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

inference speed #61

Closed
arc144 opened this issue Jun 24, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

inference speed #61

arc144 opened this issue Jun 24, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@arc144
Copy link

arc144 commented Jun 24, 2019

Hi! First of all thanks for the paper and implementation.

In the paper you mention:

CenterNet, with both center pooling and cascade corner pooling incorporated, reports an AP of 47.0% on the test-dev set, which outperforms all existing one-stage detectors by a large margin. With an average inference time of 270ms using a 52-layer hourglass back-bone [29] and 340ms using a 104-layer hourglass back-bone [29] per image, CenterNet is quite efficient yet closely matches the state-of-the-art performance of the other two-stage detectors.

The inference time you reported is using multi-scale or single-scale setup? I know it is usual to report the single scale time but from your paper it seems you are talking about multi-scale.

Thanks

@Duankaiwen
Copy link
Owner

@arc144 Hi, the inference time is using single-scale setup

@arc144 arc144 closed this as completed Jul 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants