Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DUO:000015 (“No general methods research”) #47

Closed
GiselleMarie opened this issue Feb 13, 2020 · 9 comments
Closed

DUO:000015 (“No general methods research”) #47

GiselleMarie opened this issue Feb 13, 2020 · 9 comments

Comments

@GiselleMarie
Copy link
Collaborator

The definition and the title of the DUO conflict with each other.
DUO:000015 (“No general methods research”) - description = use includes methods development research"

This was highlighted by Sanger who would like to use the ontology but can't whilst there is a mismatch between title and description.
Suggest a change of Title to "general methods research"

@solideoglori
Copy link
Collaborator

The NIH/US use case benefits from an NMDS term, as datasets are often viewed as eligible for methods research even without such annotation - meaning the prohibition is the more significant term.
As per conversations with Melanie, shall we maintain this one, and then create an MDS term as well?

@GiselleMarie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Actually - suggest a change to the description and not the title.
Change description to
"use does not allow methods development research"

@lymanrodriguez
Copy link

I concur with that suggestion as well, though suggesting being explicit that it is with reference to methods work outside of the acceptable use parameters (e.g., for a cancer DS dataset methods work in cancer research would be fine). That might be understood from language in the broader description that is not excerpted here, so please disregard if not relevant.

@mcourtot
Copy link
Collaborator

mcourtot commented May 6, 2020

Agree on changing the definition. If there is a need for an (N)MDS term we'll create a new ticket

@mcourtot
Copy link
Collaborator

@GiselleMarie do you still want the description to be changed? Just checking as you closed the ticket.

@mcourtot mcourtot reopened this Jun 19, 2020
@GiselleMarie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mcourtot sorry my bad. Don't know why I closed - yes description should be changed.

@cyamasak
Copy link
Contributor

cyamasak commented Sep 9, 2020

I also wondered if title and description have conflict. The description says "includes methods development research",
which sounds like to include "methods development = general methods research", where the title says "no general methods research". I agree to change the definition to "excludes methods development research".
No need for MDS for us.

@GiselleMarie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think we are all in agreement then.
Title = No general methods research
Description = use DOES NOT allow methods development research

@solideoglori solideoglori added this to the Hierarchy reorg milestone Nov 9, 2020
@solideoglori
Copy link
Collaborator

No change to term name.
Shorthand updated to: "NMDS"
Definition updated to: "This data use limitation indicates that use does not allow methods development research (e.g. development of software or algorithms)"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants