Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

productionProcessDescription - recommendation #74

Open
joshcornejo opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

productionProcessDescription - recommendation #74

joshcornejo opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@joshcornejo
Copy link

The current property for dprod:productionProcessDescription is a string.

A recommendation for expediting onboarding and improving automation is to allow BPEL as their definition. It could be an extension of dcat:Resource (as it could benefit other entities).

Also, there could be more than one process attached ( e.g. "onboarding", "upgrade", "resilience", "outage" )

ppd

@rivettp
Copy link
Contributor

rivettp commented Sep 25, 2024

My own opinion is that this is best left to an implementer's extension, since people have different ways of modeling processes and we don't want to force on people how to do it, since it's not the focus of DPROD. For example, BPMN would be more natural (to me) than BPEL.
Regardless, it would still be useful (IMO) to have an English textual summary of what the process does.

@rivettp rivettp added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 25, 2024
@joshcornejo
Copy link
Author

Fair enough on the focus and textual summary as a property.

I put BPEL because out of the first page results in google, it was the one with "formal" rather than BPMN "proposed".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants