Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Encryption 'sub-module' #17

Closed
cjallen-epscor opened this issue Apr 27, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Encryption 'sub-module' #17

cjallen-epscor opened this issue Apr 27, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@cjallen-epscor
Copy link
Contributor

So, at "modules/er_encryption" is it safe to say that we can delete this directory/sub-project of ERCore? Initially, the collaborators at Hawaii requested this feature. The rest of the collaboration did not seem to enthused about it.
We don't use this at NM and don't know of any one else using it as development of this sub module came to a halt when Hawaii discontinued with the collaboration.

Thoughts?

@khuffman
Copy link
Contributor

In RI we are not using it. So we would not miss it if it got deleted.
Kia

On 04/27/2015 06:07 PM, Chris Allen wrote:

So, at "modules/er_encryption" is it safe to say that we can delete this
directory/sub-project of ERCore? Initially, the collaborators at Hawaii
requested this feature. The rest of the collaboration did not seem to
enthused about it.
We don't use this at NM and don't know of any one else using it as
development of this sub module came to a halt when Hawaii discontinued
with the collaboration.

Thoughts?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17.

@iserna
Copy link
Contributor

iserna commented Apr 27, 2015

Yes, I think it may worth deleting. Though, we will need to ask everyone on the Admin side specifically Hawaii since they were the jurisdiction requiring it. Let's leave it as is for now.

@iserna iserna closed this as completed Jul 21, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants