fix issue #19, update promoters metadata #78
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The UCI link gives the pre-processed data. I think it's more straightforward if we just cite this link from openml. I can't save my changes on your colab notebook, so I made a copy to verify they're the same here. We also need to remove the |
|
I found instance feature in the metadata but cannot find it on the dataset. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this (unfinished!) PR removes the promoters dataset because it is a duplicate of molecular_biology_promoters (issue #19). I also began to add metadata to molecular_biology_promoters, but I have not yet gotten the source data to exactly match our version. It also appears that the class labels are reversed which we might want to fix.
here is a colab notebook where i'm working on source verification