Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cannot reproduce results on wmt14 ende distill #13

Open
fernando9torres opened this issue Jan 6, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

cannot reproduce results on wmt14 ende distill #13

fernando9torres opened this issue Jan 6, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@fernando9torres
Copy link

I follow the instructions but I cannot reproduce the results on wmt14 ende. With the provided generation script I only got
BLEU4 = 16.65, 48.6/22.0/11.4/6.3 (BP=1.000, ratio=1.014, syslen=65432, reflen=64506)
After re-ranking with an AT model, I got
BLEU4 = 19.93, 52.2/25.6/14.2/8.3 (BP=1.000, ratio=1.013, syslen=65313, reflen=64506)
Still far from 26.55 as reported in the paper.
I use the provided training script and train the model on 8 V100 GPUs. The training log shows that the glat accuracy is pretty high at the end of training.
epoch 151: 1050 / 1993 loss=3.323, nll_loss=1.371, glat_accu=0.758, glat_keep=0.073, glat_context_p=0.3, word_ins=3.162, length=3.223, ppl=10.01, wps=132588, ups=2.16, wpb=61302.6, bsz=2018.2, num_updates=300000, lr=5.7735e-05, gnorm=1.455, clip=0, train_wall=46, gb_free=6.8, wall=139238
But the valid loss is also very high.
valid | epoch 151 | valid on 'valid' subset | loss 7.412 | nll_loss 5.888 | glat_accu 0 | glat_keep 0 | glat_context_p 0 | word_ins 7.252 | length 3.209 | ppl 170.31 | wps 242820 | wpb 41551 | bsz 1500 | num_updates 300000 | best_loss 6.511

@hhh07
Copy link

hhh07 commented Dec 5, 2023

Have you solved the problem now?I have the same problemQAQ

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants