-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Service disruption: Attempts to reply to Discourse by email bounce #44
Comments
I started to look closer at this but didn't get to finish before today's scheduled power outage at RIT. I hope to fix email replies no later than the end of the week. |
I made progress today. This was never working because I misunderstood the Discourse documentation. I never had a mailbox set up to receive the email replies. I dug deeper and found out Discourse offers a Docker image to handle incoming email replies. I followed the provided instructions for the image but emails are not making it to the container. I need to investigate why since it is not an issue at the DNS level, as far as I can tell. Some links for me to remember later:
|
Looking into this again today. Hope to have an update soon. |
Still hitting a wall with this. I'm using the official mail-receiver image to set up incoming email, but emails never make it to the Discourse host. There could be a number of things going on here, but here are my notes from today:
My next thing to try is creating a new domain specific for receiving mail instead of using the root domain. Perhaps the SendGrid outgoing mail rules are interfering with incoming mail (which doesn't make sense because MX records only deal with incoming mail). But I'm running out of options… 😐 Shell commands to remember# keep checking if incoming mail arrives to mail-receiver container
watch -b -c -d -n 5 -p ./launcher logs mail-receiver
# any time I make changes to mail-receiver container env
./launcher rebuild mail-receiver
# mail-receiver container env
vim containers/mail-receiver.yml |
Fixed!Reply-by-email and starting new threads by email is now working. The issue was that DigitalOcean maintains a firewall a level about the Linux Droplet level. When updating ports (such as opening port 25 for incoming email), the firewall needed to be updated from the DigitalOcean admin interface in addition to opening it on the host with A Runbook PR is coming soon to add this to the existing Discourse Runbook page. That PR will close this issue. 🎬 |
This commit adds documentation for an obscure issue when it comes to updating any of the DigitalOcean infrastructure associated with the Discourse forum. More details are explained in the changed lines in the commit and FOSSRIT/infrastructure#44. Closes FOSSRIT/infrastructure#44. Signed-off-by: Justin W. Flory <git@jwf.io>
This commit adds documentation for an obscure issue when it comes to updating any of the DigitalOcean infrastructure associated with the Discourse forum. More details are explained in the changed lines in the commit and FOSSRIT/infrastructure#44. Closes FOSSRIT/infrastructure#44. Signed-off-by: Justin W. Flory <git@jwf.io>
This commit adds documentation for an obscure issue when it comes to updating any of the DigitalOcean infrastructure associated with the Discourse forum. More details are explained in the changed lines in the commit and FOSSRIT/infrastructure#44. Closes FOSSRIT/infrastructure#44. Signed-off-by: Justin W. Flory <git@jwf.io>
) This commit adds documentation for an obscure issue when it comes to updating any of the DigitalOcean infrastructure associated with the Discourse forum. More details are explained in the changed lines in the commit and FOSSRIT/infrastructure#44. Closes FOSSRIT/infrastructure#44. Signed-off-by: Justin W. Flory <git@jwf.io>
Summary
Email replies to Discourse bounce
Expected results
!. Compose email reply to a Discourse topic/thread/whatever-they-are
2. Send
3. Reply is accepted and included in the discussion
Actual results
Priority requested
Other details
This appears to be what the Discourse SMTP server is sending my mail server:
So, it's clear enough to infer that the bit between the plus symbol and the at symbol is unique to the specific message to which one is trying to reply, and that there would not be a user with the entirety of that local part in any lookup table. Everything to the left of the @ is meant to be handled only by the local mail system. Plus addressing, as I understand it, is meant to be able to accomodate this sort of thing, but it may require some tweaking to the receiving MTA configuration to allow it to pass on through to discourse.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: