Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OSPF6 area: Area support for OSPFv3 is not yet implemented? #2453

Closed
askylee opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

OSPF6 area: Area support for OSPFv3 is not yet implemented? #2453

askylee opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
question Not a bug

Comments

@askylee
Copy link

askylee commented Jun 15, 2018

Is it true?

OSFPv3 does not support multiple areas?

Thanks,
Asky

@qlyoung qlyoung added the question Not a bug label Jun 15, 2018
@askylee askylee changed the title OSPF6 area Area support for OSPFv3 is not yet implemented. OSPF6 area Area support for OSPFv3 is not yet implemented? Jun 19, 2018
@askylee askylee changed the title OSPF6 area Area support for OSPFv3 is not yet implemented? OSPF6 area: Area support for OSPFv3 is not yet implemented? Jun 19, 2018
@donaldsharp
Copy link
Member

This is supported

@jdrews
Copy link

jdrews commented Mar 4, 2020

Looks like the latest docs indicate that OSPF6 area support is not implemented.

http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html
image

I think that's being pulled from here?
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/blob/master/doc/user/ospf6d.rst#ospf6-area

@netravnen
Copy link
Contributor

netravnen commented Mar 4, 2020 via email

@jdrews
Copy link

jdrews commented Mar 4, 2020

in certain areas

heh. heh.

I recommend you to double-check the latest release (FRR v7.3) and see
which commands is supported (e.g. on the CLI, execute "find area")

Will do! Thanks!

bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

So add support to the pfSense UI to enable multiple areas in the same format as OSPFv2.
bmhughes added a commit to bmhughes/FreeBSD-ports that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2020
Contrary to the FRR documentation (http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/ospf6d.html#ospf6-area)
OSPFv3 areas are fully supported in FRR (FRRouting/frr#2453)

- Add area tab to OSPFv3 configuration.
- Split OSPFv3 configuration generation out into Area/Interface/Main functions as OSPFv2.
- Update validation for OSPFv3 to support multiple areas.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Not a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants