Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nhrp #571

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 18, 2017
Merged

Nhrp #571

merged 4 commits into from
May 18, 2017

Conversation

donaldsharp
Copy link
Member

Fixes issue #570 as well as grabs a commit Timo wanted in and fixes some missing newlines I noticed

donaldsharp and others added 3 commits May 17, 2017 18:30
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
RFC2332 states that prefix length MUST be 0xff for unique bindings.
However, it seems at least some Cisco firmwares use host prefix
length instead (which on wire level makes sense). Relax the handling
of prefix length to treat all value longer than address length as
0xff. Additionally treat 0x00 the same way too, this is required
by the RFC. This also fixes the prefix length address family to be
checked against protocol address.
Signed-off-by: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@iki.fi>
@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-746/

This is a comment from an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

Copy link
Contributor

@fabled fabled left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The clean ups look good. The prefix change should be OK, I've been waiting for testing feedback for it, but perhaps it should be just committed.

Signed-off-by: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@iki.fi>
@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-755/

This is a comment from an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.


CLANG Static Analyzer Summary

  • Github Pull Request 571, comparing to Git base SHA bac7b7b

Bug comparison statistics:

  • Fixed bugs: 0
  • New bugs: 0

142 Static Analyzer issues remaining.

See details at
https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-755/artifact/shared/static_analysis/index.html

@eqvinox eqvinox merged commit 4d2d73c into FRRouting:master May 18, 2017
@donaldsharp donaldsharp deleted the nhrp branch May 29, 2017 18:06
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants