Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which spec is SourceDescription.version a part of? #46

Closed
justincy opened this issue Sep 26, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Which spec is SourceDescription.version a part of? #46

justincy opened this issue Sep 26, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@justincy
Copy link

No description provided.

@stoicflame
Copy link
Member

I actually don't know how that got there. It doesn't appear to be used by FamilySearch, so I can't identify a use case. It may just be a superfluous artifact of the Java code.

@justincy
Copy link
Author

It appears to have been intentionally added a year ago in 5f23fce. You can ask the committer about it, if you haven't already.

It appears in the source description that is attached to the GedcomX root element of a person response when requested from the platform API.

  {
    "id" : "SD-K1VK-9B3",
    "citations" : [ {
      "lang" : "en",
      "value" : "\"Family Tree,\" database, <i>FamilySearch</i> (http://familysearch.org : modified 10 June 2016, 00:03), entry for Helen Gertrude Zierak(PID https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/4:1:K1VK-9B3); contributed by various users."
    } ],
    "about" : "#K1VK-9B3",
    "componentOf" : {
      "description" : "https://familysearch.org/platform/collections/tree"
    },
    "titles" : [ {
      "value" : "Helen Gertrude Zierak"
    } ],
    "resourceType" : "http://gedcomx.org/Person",
    "identifiers" : {
      "http://gedcomx.org/Persistent" : [ "https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/4:1:K1VK-9B3" ]
    },
    "modified" : 1465517011000,
    "version" : "136848098114480000"
  }

@stoicflame
Copy link
Member

Okay, now I'm remembering.

Well, it needs to be at least added to the RS spec for now. We may want to consider moving it to the core spec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants