Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 19, 2022. It is now read-only.

Remove CSS-in-JS comparison table #927

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2017
Merged

Conversation

alexlande
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #926

@paulathevalley: Could you help me deploy this change to http://formidable.com/open-source/radium/docs? Not sure what our process is for that nowadays.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 16, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.236% when pulling aec7a63 on chore-removeComparisonTable into 905227c on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.236% when pulling aec7a63 on chore-removeComparisonTable into 905227c on master.

Copy link
Member

@ryan-roemer ryan-roemer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I can help you with the deployment on Monday if @paulathevalley is unavailable.

@ryan-roemer
Copy link
Member

@paulathevalley @alexlande -- For the upstream -docs repo, let's also change our dep on radium here https://github.com/FormidableLabs/radium-docs/blob/master/package.json#L36 to actually hard pin a specific version like here https://github.com/FormidableLabs/formidable-playbook-docs/blob/master/package.json#L45

For reference, here's my "catch up infrastructure and stuff" PR for formidable-playbook-docs that may have some useful tidbits for radium-docs: https://github.com/FormidableLabs/formidable-playbook-docs/pull/29/files (Not completely analogous builds though...)

@paulathevalley
Copy link
Contributor

Yes! I can help deploy these changes today.

@alexlande alexlande merged commit 4c238eb into master Sep 19, 2017
@alexlande alexlande deleted the chore-removeComparisonTable branch September 19, 2017 18:09
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants