-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
Should I use @pika/pack
?
#91
Comments
Unfortunately there’s no good replacement for We’ve talked about reinvesting in My personal recommendation is: if you use TypeScript to write your code, use Of course, if you or anyone else you know really wants a tool to package npm packages again and would be willing to help, I’d be happy to chat about that too 🙂. |
@drwpow I would love to see you guys commit more time to |
@kysley tsdx being abandoned frustrates me. I found a thing called rollpkg that you might be interest in. |
Hi, big fan of Snowpack here. Thanks for your work on it.
The below link leads to a
404
, and I wasn't sure where else to ask this question.I'd like to publish a react-based module on NPM, and googling around, I see there's a few ways to package a module but no consensus for the best way to do it as far as I can tell.
@pika/pack
seems like a good way to go, especially since it seems to have the same creator as Snowpack, and Snowpack is great. But, it looks like@pika/pack
hasn't been updated in two years.It seems to now be hosted under snowpack's git repo. Maybe snowpack now has
@pika/pack
functionality? I don't see any docs that say how to use snowpack for that purpose though, and the docs on snowpack's@pika/pack
page do still refer to e.g.npm install --dev @pika/pack
.Skypack's twitter page is called "Skypack (prev. pika)" so maybe it's skypack that has the functionality of
@pika/pack
that I'm looking for? But I don't see docs using skypack for that purpose.What's the correct tool to use to compile/package a React component for publishing on NPM? Do I do that now with skypack, snowpack,
@pika/pack
, or something else?To create a new issue or search existing discussions, start here:
👉 https://www.pika.dev/packages/@pika/pack/discuss 👈
All new issues created directly through GitHub will be closed.
Learn more: https://www.pika.dev/discussions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: