Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FITS interactive charts - parameter groupings #65

Open
carolinelittle opened this issue Sep 1, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

FITS interactive charts - parameter groupings #65

carolinelittle opened this issue Sep 1, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@carolinelittle
Copy link

As there are so many parameters it might be more user friendly if the parameters were grouped. Currently to look at GPS/GNSS plots you select 'up' or 'east'

Also more than half of the first 10 parameters don't have any data ATM?

@carolinelittle
Copy link
Author

Building on this, it would be great if you could select multiple (linked) parameters, e.g. if you could 'ctrl select' up, north, and east as well as several GPS stations, or H2S and CO2, to compare on graphs below.

@rumachan
Copy link

@carolinelittle @gclitheroe
I've just been talking with Brad about the general issue of making data in FITS easily findable by the everyday users of our data (non-scientists, such as DOC staff or White Island tour guides, to use his examples). He is quite vocal about this, as always, but I suspect others share his views, to some extent, only they haven't yet said anything.

I think it would be a good idea for us to have a strategic chat about how we are going to get FITS more used, more usable. Its probably a combination of things:
-some more outreach so people know its there and what data are available. This is partly held up by the lack of frequently updating vocano data
-some in-house education on using url queries, for those who can understand or want to understand. I suspect some, like Brad, simply don't want to understand
-some plan for what an interactive interface to FITS looks like, beyond what already exists.

If we can do that then I think we'd have a good forward path.

@gclitheroe gclitheroe self-assigned this Apr 27, 2016
@rumachan
Copy link

I think my earlier comment is still useful. One view is that FITS itself could have improved plotting capability. An alternative is that another tool, which accesses FITS data, does the plotting and provides these improved capabilities.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants