You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This would allow users to click on a non-eroding or non-prograding beach and still get an informative graph back showing temporal change.
This would be particularly useful for wave-dominated beaches without persistent temporal trends, or where coastline movement is driven by fluctuating climatic drivers.
A mockup of how this would function (see also #39, #30, #29):
if wms_t_sig:
if wms_t_grew:
beach grew by wms_t_abs (+- wms_t_conf)
if wms_t_retr:
beach eroded by wms_t_abs (+- wms_t_conf)
if wms_t_less:
this rate was smaller than X warning
if wms_t_nsig:
beach was net stable since 1988 (e.g. no retreating or growing trend)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would allow users to click on a non-eroding or non-prograding beach and still get an informative graph back showing temporal change.
This would be particularly useful for wave-dominated beaches without persistent temporal trends, or where coastline movement is driven by fluctuating climatic drivers.
A mockup of how this would function (see also #39, #30, #29):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: