Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle QOF dependency #15

Open
oskarb opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Handle QOF dependency #15

oskarb opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@oskarb
Copy link
Collaborator

oskarb commented Feb 20, 2023

This issue is meant to track and discuss what to do about QOF.

Source code: https://github.com/codehelp/qof

The master branch does build on e.g. Fedora 37, if ignoring warnings about deprecated stuff. (Several "warning: 'GTimeVal' is deprecated: Use 'GDateTime'".) autogen (autoupdate) does also give some warnings and suggestions for modernizing.

For reaching the goal of being able to distribute binary GnoTime distribution packages, those would need to include libqof binary. Or we would need to resurrect/adopt earlier libqof binary packages and get them back so we can depend on them.

Although, for binary distribution, I would be interested in primarily targetting Flatpack, and the idea would be it would include the libqof binary.

With the codehelp/qof seeing very little activity for many years and no binary packages available in dists, it of course also raises the question of if there is a risk that this source code suddenly disappears. To mitigate that, we could fork the qof repo into the GnoTime github organisation. That would probably be simpler compared to embedding the source code into the GnoTime repo, although that is another option. A separate repo (with light modifications) could have benefits in terms of incorporating changes from upstream, in case there is some activity again. And for sending any changes we make to upstream.

A completely different approach would be to get rid of libqof entirely. Maybe load up the data in a temporary sqlite if we want to use SQL. I have not investigated this.

@oskarb oskarb changed the title Handle QOF Handle QOF dependency Feb 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant