Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for dockerfile/1.3.0 #1712

Open
darkdragon-001 opened this issue Aug 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Add support for dockerfile/1.3.0 #1712

darkdragon-001 opened this issue Aug 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
area/dockerfile-command For all bugs related to dockerfile file commands categorized differs-from-docker feat/docker-syntax kind/enhancement New feature or request priority/p1 Basic need feature compatibility with docker build. we should be working on this next.

Comments

@darkdragon-001
Copy link

Actual behavior
New features from dockerfile/1.3.0 are not available (1, 2)

Expected behavior
Feature parity with docker.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Try to build a Dockerfile with 1.3.0 syntax.

Additional Information

  • Dockerfile
  • Build Context
  • Kaniko Image (fully qualified with digest)

Triage Notes for the Maintainers

Description Yes/No
Please check if this a new feature you are proposing
Please check if the build works in docker but not in kaniko
Please check if this error is seen when you use --cache flag
Please check if your dockerfile is a multistage dockerfile
@guillaume-d
Copy link

guillaume-d commented Aug 6, 2021

Well, dockerfile/1.2.0 is not available either, see #1568. So this bug depends on that being fixed too/first.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/dockerfile-command For all bugs related to dockerfile file commands categorized differs-from-docker feat/docker-syntax kind/enhancement New feature or request priority/p1 Basic need feature compatibility with docker build. we should be working on this next.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants