.NET 2.0 Compatibility

[sungiant]

Any plans for this?

[dsyme]

I've not heard of anyone still using .NET 2.0 for quite a long time - any particular reason you're still using that? Just wondering, thanks

[GregRos]

@dsyme I'm guessing it's some legacy environment. I don't think anyone would actually use it of their own volition 😄

@sungiant Not really. It's possible to lower the framework version to 3.5 Client Profile, if there's a demand for that, but some parts of the library have tons of LINQ in them (not the performant parts, of course). It'd be quite a bit of work.

[sungiant]

Unity3D is still running .NET 2.0: http://docs.unity3d.com/410/Documentation/ScriptReference/MonoCompatibility.html

[GregRos]

@sungiant, what Unity says is ".NET 2.0" actually has a number of 3.5 features, like System.Linq. From my experience, assemblies compiled for 3.5 usually run fine on Unity. I'll try to work on 3.5 compatibility if I have time. Will probably need to set up some kind of build system.