We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would make it possible to filter them out when computing metrics (files, pages) or when browsing the catalog
However, I'm wondering if we should have 2 flags, one for "suitable as GT for layout recognition" and one for "suitable as GT for text recognition".
Some datasets as suitable to train text recognition models but not layout recognition models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
It would make it possible to filter them out when computing metrics (files, pages) or when browsing the catalog
However, I'm wondering if we should have 2 flags, one for "suitable as GT for layout recognition" and one for "suitable as GT for text recognition".
Some datasets as suitable to train text recognition models but not layout recognition models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: