You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Ring we ask that the carrier be an abelian group and we also ask for the entire thing to be a ring. This ends up with having duplicated assumptions on the underlying abelian group. It doesn't affect anything in practice since these are all equal as hprops, but it does mean some terms might not unify as expected.
In
Ring
we ask that the carrier be an abelian group and we also ask for the entire thing to be a ring. This ends up with having duplicated assumptions on the underlying abelian group. It doesn't affect anything in practice since these are all equal as hprops, but it does mean some terms might not unify as expected.See #1921
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: