You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Marked NotInScope as Prof has stated in the forum that "Recovering from improper edits to the data file (or other config files) was not an expectations at v1.4, unless you specifically stated such a feature in the UG." (Link)
Furthermore, we believe that even if this report was valid, it should be of Medium severity as:
We believe this product only inconveniences a small subset of users as not many users would be comfortable enough with technology to want to edit the json directly.
Point (1) is especially true for our target audience (wedding planners).
Items for the Tester to Verify
❓ Issue response
Team chose [response.NotInScope]
I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
❓ Issue severity
Team chose [severity.Medium]
Originally [severity.High]
I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Description
If a user edits the json data and makes two users have the same name, the data will not be loaded properly into the application.
Steps to reproduce
Change two persons to have the same name in the json.
Expected behaviour
Error message stating data is not valid. Or some warnings guide.
Actual behaviour
Application loads with no data.
Elaboration of labels
The main reason why I put high severity is because the application saves data on exit.
Consider this scenario:
Functionality bug because it is a legitimate user behaviour that may happen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: