Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider HEAD as part of protocol requirements #1609

Closed
azaroth42 opened this issue May 12, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Consider HEAD as part of protocol requirements #1609

azaroth42 opened this issue May 12, 2018 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@azaroth42
Copy link
Member

@mejackreed on Slack:
As a Presentation API harvester, it might be good to know up front with a HEAD request what the headers for a response might be. Could there be a SHOULD guidance that Presentation API providers respond to HEAD requests? https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html#sec9.4

(Same applies to info.json, but putting it in Prezi milestone)

@azaroth42
Copy link
Member Author

@mejackreed Should this apply to HEAD on image requests as well?

@mejackreed
Copy link
Contributor

I hadn't thought of that, but it seems like it makes sense to be generally available for image requests.

@jpstroop
Copy link
Member

jpstroop commented Aug 1, 2018

Maybe make explicit in Section 6 of Prezi 3?

@azaroth42
Copy link
Member Author

Summary from community call of 2018-08-01: General agreement to put this into the spec, in section 6 of Prezi and equivalent in Image.

@zimeon
Copy link
Member

zimeon commented Sep 5, 2018

Add to end of section 6 prezi something along the lines of "It is RECOMMENDED that implementations also support HTTP HEAD requests.", a bit more involved in Image API but perhaps add intro to Section 7 which suggests HEAD as well as GET (and OPTIONS)

@zimeon
Copy link
Member

zimeon commented Mar 12, 2019

Approved by TRC, already merged into image-prezi-rc2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants