Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move editorial process doc to website repo #1637

Closed
azaroth42 opened this issue Jul 9, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Move editorial process doc to website repo #1637

azaroth42 opened this issue Jul 9, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
discuss editorial process website

Comments

@azaroth42
Copy link
Member

The process of discussing, defining, documenting and approving specifications should live in the community area of the site, not the specifications part. It should still be normative with requirements, but it's a process document related to the formation and work of TSGs (and soon to exist TRC).
@zimeon zimeon changed the title Move editorial process doc to web Move editorial process doc to website repo Jul 9, 2018
@zimeon zimeon mentioned this issue Jul 9, 2018
Closed
@azaroth42
Copy link
Member Author

Blocked by no TRC... no point moving this without reformulating.

@azaroth42
Copy link
Member Author

Unblocked!

@azaroth42 azaroth42 removed the blocked label Oct 18, 2018
@azaroth42
Copy link
Member Author

azaroth42 commented Nov 12, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Propose to split editors to community/editors and community/policy/editorial.

@zimeon
Copy link
Member

zimeon commented Nov 12, 2018

Need also to update Community Process in editorial process document when TRC is formed (was #1638 but closing as tied with this issue)

This was referenced Nov 12, 2018
Closed
Closed
Merged
@azaroth42
Copy link
Member Author

Closed #1727

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
discuss editorial process website
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@zimeon @azaroth42